Eng 101 Expository Essay Final Paper

uprightnesss for the utility in Educational Standards No Child Left Behind is an fantabulous sword that we hobo use to open doors for the kidskinren we represent (Wright, Attorney at Law). Peter Wright is an attorney who surplusizes in cases surrounding nipperren with particular Educational needs. When he do this statement, he was referring to a virtue that President George W. Bushs administration passed in 2001. No Child Left Behind (NCLB) is a constabulary that requires states to assess the primary skills for children in certain grades. This was non the jump law to be created by the government.Before NCLB was created, first thither was office 504 of the Rehabilitation impress, and the second was the item-by-item with Disabilities Educational Improvement take on (IDEIA) to a fault known as Public Law 94-142. Every since the first law was created in the early 1970s schooltimes tout ensemble over have complained. So schools would non have to abide by these laws sta tes would refuse the supporting that was granted to them by the government for fosterage. When these laws were created, it was to protect all children with any kind of special needs. Before Section 504 was created schools could legally expel any child they supposition may have had a learning impairment.Section 504 of the Rehabilitation snatch In 1973 Section 504 of the Rehabilitation deport was created to be an anti-discrimination statute meant to freeze discrimination against educatees with special needs from governmental actors and to protect these students equal rights. For a student to qualify for protection down the stairs Section 504 he or she mustiness be determined to (1) have a physical or mental impairment that stand limit one or more major life activities (2) it must be on record that the child does have an impairment or (3) the child must be looked at as possessing said impairment.All students who qualify under Section 504 argon entit conduct to a free and appropriate public preparation alike known as FAPE. If a school violated the Section 504 laws the student must show (1) that he or she does have a disability stated in Section 504 (2) that the student does qualify for said public assistance that he or she were denied (3) that the student was denied because of his or her disability, and (4) that the benefit that student was denied is obtaining silver from the government to help with the program (Hoffman-Peak, 2009).The US part of Education (ED) is liable for enforcing Section 504 for all schools receiving funds. Recipients of these funds include all public schools, colleges, and new(prenominal) reproduction agencies inwardly the state. Individual with Disabilities Educational Improvement shape In 1975 relative created the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (Public Law 94-142). This Act stated that any school receiving federal funds is required to succeed equal access to upbringing for children with any kind of di sability.With the input of the childs parents public schools had to evaluate the student and create an educational program that would be as nearly as possible to that of a non-disabled student. The Act also stated that school districts must fork over administrative procedures for parents so they may dispute decisions surrounding their childs education. Once these administrative efforts had become exhausted, the parents would be allowed to seek a judicial review under Section 504. The system of dispute resolution created by PL 94-142 was to help with the monetary burden created by litigation.In 1997 President Clinton and Congress amended the law to Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). This would be the first time since Public Law 94-142 was created in 1975 that a significant change was made while retaining the basic protections. The goal was to clarify, strengthen, and provide guidance on the law. The second time would be in 2004 when Congress would once again make amendments calling it Individual with Disabilities Educational Improvement Act (IDEIA).For 20 course of instructions the research showed that education can be more effective if (1) it is turn backd that the child receives general education to the maximum extent possible (2) the parents role in the childs education is stronger (3) coordinating efforts from the school and agencies are made to guarantee that children are benefiting from these efforts. Also that special education is a expediency for children not a place for them to be sent off to, and (4) all personal who work with children with special needs bequeath receive the appropriate education to teach these students.Because Public Law 94-142 was created a great shell out of progress has been made toward meeting our nations goals for creating programs for individuals with special needs. much(prenominal) accomplishments had included, one that a majority of children with special needs were included in regular classrooms wi th non-disabled children. No Child Left Behind Act at once after taking office in 2001 President George W. Bush proposed the base for the No Child Left Behind Act. The bill passed through the get together Stated House of Representatives on whitethorn 23, 2001, and again on June 14, 2001 by the United States Senate.After first proposing the Act close to a year before President Bush signed the Act into law on January 8, 2002. The goal behind this law was to hold schools and states accountable for improving the education of both disabled and non-disabled students. The purpose was to identify than transform schools that have not provided an excellent education to students. These schools would be turned into successful schools. Furthermore, NCLB intentions are to close the learning gap between high and low achievers, minority and non-minority students as well as advantaged and disadvantaged students.To accomplish this goal the reform plotted to use a state assessment system designed t o en sure all students are meeting the state academic and grade take content. The implementation of these goals, call for a high level standard that can be measured for all students. There is no doubt that this Act has brought a closer look on students who normally have performed on a lower level of education, causing it to be praised, while at the same time this law has been criticized by many because inconsistencies found within the law.Title One of the No Child Left Behind Act states a measure called suitable Yearly Progress (AYP) in which schools, districts, and states must be held accountable for the education performance of students. However, there are faults with the Adequate Yearly Progress one of these faults is whether or not AYP can provide an accurate measurement of the goals because states are allowed to make their own standards. Statistics show that there are 50 different educational measurement standards across the country.Because these states can create their own s tandards, they can manipulate their AYP, thus resulting in schools big(a) the impression that they are successful in teaching when they may not be. The Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act In 2010 President Obama and Congress assembled a innovation of reform called The Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. This blueprint builds and re-envisions a federal role around these five priorities.It states that (1) all students disdain their race, income, ethnic or language background, or disability pull up stakes be college and career ready when they graduate from high school. The government will defy all states to implement a better education through an rise of a employmental development. (2) The government will elevate the teaching profession so as to recognize excellence in teaching. All school districts must develop a system that supports teachers. (3) Schools that have the most receipts from their students will be rewarded.This includes students graduating and those on their way to graduating by 2020. To make sure that the responsibility for improving does not fall all on the schools, states and districts will be held accountable for not providing their schools the support they need to succeed. (4) Incentives will be provided to encourage state and districts to work with schools to improve education of students. The government will support college going strategies to help students succeed. (5) A new competitive funding will help with flexibility, reward results, and ensure that these funds provided are apply wisely.While districts will not be restricted on how they put down the funding. The government will help create new ideas that support family and the alliance with their childs education (The Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act). goal Since 1973 when Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act was introduced into Congress there has been one crystallise goal amongst government. This goal is for all students no matter their background or disability are to receive an education. In the past 38 old age Congress has reformed and amended all the education laws for improvement in the education system.It would no longer be acceptable for schools to fail in giving students the education they deserve. Throughout the years statics have shown that despite laws created our education system is failing and needs vast improvement in tack together for the next generation to succeed in the future. As stated by President Barack Obama in a letter, he wrote to be placed in the introduction of The Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. America was once the opera hat educated nation in the world. A generation ago we led all nations in college completion, but today 10 countries have passed us.It is not that their students are smarter than ours. It is that these countries are being smarter about how they educate their students References Author enigmati cal (September 2010) Adequate Yearly Progress, Education Week Retrieved on May 23, 2011, from http//www. edweek. org/ew/issues/adequate-yearly-progress/ Berlatsky, N. (2011) No Child Left Behind Is a Good Law. oppose Viewpoints School emend. Detroit Greenhaven Press, from Powersearch. Hoffman-Peak, H. (Summer 2009) A Matrimonial Practitioners Guide to Special Education Law. American Journal of Family Law. Retrieved May 19, 2011 from, Powersearch Maleyko, G. Gawlik, M. A. (Spring 2011) No child go away behind what we know and what we need to know. Education. Retrieved on May 19, 2011, from Powersearch Us Department of Education (August 2010) Free Appropriate Public Education for Student With Disabilities. Retrieved May 23, 2011, from http//www2. ed. gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/edlite-FAPE504. html US Government, (March 2010). A Blueprint for Reform The Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. ED. gov. Retrieved on May 20, 2011, from http//www2. ed. gov/po licy/elsec/leg/blueprint/publicationtoc. html