Critical Success Factor Analysis Essay Example for Free

Critical Success chemical element Analysis EssayThis wasnt the case for AA. They had clear Organisational vision and views set turn out from the beginning. Their reason for the refreshing dodge was to improve the standards of customer service for customer loyalty and to reduce their cost which is their organisational strategy.This resulted in three main production line requirements for the new IS. Development of a nationally-based clay Separation of the functions The provision of a base for new products or servicesAAs system was definitely a business-led system. They had the idea for AAHELP long before technology caught up enough for the system to be implemented. Their IS system was led by a long-term vision from instruction back.A lot could be contrasted during the implementation grade besides. In AAs case, they used a phase-by-phase approach. Each phase would have a business case. This was to make the job of convincing the board easier. This proved useful non only i n convincing the board, but also in that it allowed a certain degree of flexibility, as the system could be adapted in order to deal with the changes in the organisation more generally.This slack incremental approach to the development meant that even though the overall time of the project took longer, the system was canvas more thoroughly, and thus was much less likely to have problems later on when it would cost a lot more to fix.This is shown very clearly in the Symons case. They hired ProSys to deliver the full system in one go. During implementation, they found a lot of costly errors such as differences in Numbering Systems, and changes to the system which cost them an additional 15,000.IT TEAMThere were some differences between the two even in their I.T Team. Firstly, AA had their individualised in-house I.T staff while Symons hired programmers. There argon several benefits of in-house I.T staff. It takes shorter time for problems to be sorted out. other difference was tha t the IT Team all worked in one location only. This built team spirit and further formal and informal communications. Working so close together also meant that problems would be noticed, and sorted out much faster.Strategic Information Systems Planning MethodologiesThe task of strategic information systems planning is demanding and oftentimes time organizations do not know how to do it. Strategic information systems planning is a study change for organizations, from planning for information systems based on users demands to those based on business strategy.Vitale, et al. (1986) classifies SISP methodologies into two categories relate and dressment. Impact methodologies help create and justify new uses of IT, while the methodologies in the alignment category align IS objectives with organizational goals.Impact MethodologiesValue Chain AnalysisA form analysing business activities. It helps in invent information systems which increase the overall profit available to a firm and i dentifying the potential for mutual business advantages of component businesses, in the same or related industries, available from information interchange. It concentrates on value-adding business activities and is supreme of organizational structure.Strengths It concentrates on direct value adding activities of a firm and thus pitches information systems right into the commonwealth of value adding rather than cost cuttingWeaknesses Basic concept of a value chain is difficult to apply to non-manufacturing organizations where the product is not tangible and there are no obvious raw materials. It also fails to address the developmental and implementation issues.Critical success factors compendium can be considered to be some(prenominal) an impact as well as an alignment methodology. Critical Success Factors (CSF) in the context of SISP are used for interpreting more clearly the objectives, tactics, and operational activities in terms of key information take of an organization and its managers and strengths and weaknesses of the organizations existing systems. Critical success factors are limited areas of the business where if the result is satisfactory, will check off successful competitive performance for the organisationStrengths CSF analysis provides a very powerful method for concentrating on key information requirements of an organization, a business unit, or of a manager. This allows the management to concentrate resources on maturation information systems around these requirements. Also, CSF analysis is easy to perform and can be carried out with few resources.Weaknesses CSF analysis by itself is not enough to perform comprehensive SISP because it does not define a data computer architecture or provide automated support for analysis. CSFs also focus primarily on management ascertain and thus tend to be internally focused and analytical rather than creative