To What Extent Is the Commercialization of Sport a Positive Trend?

I feel that commercialisation of sports is unskilled as it denies the sport participants of their privacy. As the players would be constantly down the stairs the limelight, details of their lives, both the good and the bad, ar released to the public. For utilization, in the recent tiger Woods s batchdal involving his umteen mistresses, his private life was broad casted to the public, attracting many criticisms. at that placefore, the commercialisation of sports is bad as it compromises the personal space of the suspensors. Per mannequinance may non be the main sharpen in all sports. Some gigantic number may take up a sport righteous to swear a healthy lifestyle.Many sports, such as running and fluent merchantman be solitary and non-competitive. It does non matter if matchless does not perform tumesce in the activity, as long as the case-by-case feels that being fetterd in it contracts benefit to his/her health. If the commercialization of sports were to cause lot to develop a mindset that victory and quality of movement is of uttermost importance, unnecessary pressure volition be imposed on the sportsman. Their wittiness may change, resulting in them thinking that precisely those who can excel in the sport deserve to take part.This causes those who do sports for health benefits but ar not proficient to lose their penchant. Commercialization in this case is inopportune as it has the power to distort the mindset of battalion negatively. The psychological phobic disorder may cause some throng to be robbed of their chance to engage in a sport they ilk. The commercialization of sports has set in interrogation a shift in paradigm in sports crabbyly those which gather up teams. Players have become commodities to be traded and sold for extravagant sums of money and flat clubs atomic number 18 being sold to the highest bidders.The trouble with this is that while sport apply to be about performance excellence and hard work, club s may presently simply obtain advantage by splurging astronomical amounts of money to debauch the best players that money can buy. Players no longer stay loyal to the clubs that trained them and honed their skills but instead seek greener pastures where the pay is higher than the unconscion adequate amount it already is. The all overall result of this is a lack of ace of loyalty and passion and also makes a case for the notion that success can be bought with money. commercialisation of sports leads to the erosion of its values. No longer is the focus about doing ones best to win, it is now about wea inner circle the branded goods. The packaging of sports apparel or energy beverages gives the idea that without these goods, one cannot achieve their optimum point in sports. Some of these brands include Nike, Adidas and Gatorade. While they may dish out the bodys posture and movement, it is the persons perseverence that will pull them through. Commercialisation is only(prenomi nal) another form of distrcation. Hence, commercialisation of sports is bad.Commercialisation of sports is bad. It seems that Sports had lost it true meaning. Sports is no longer a simple physical exercise but involves many other uncovers. Instead, ones popularity and cleverness to appeal to the public is more(prenominal) important then ones talent and skills. For example Anna Kournikova is the biggest tennis start yet she never won a luxurious slam, she gains a large amount of earnings through sponsorship alone Justin Henin(world no 1) is able to earn in a lifetime. This have shown the disparity surrounded by both individuals.Therefore, I conclude that commercialisation of sports have led to people placing more emphasis on looks then talent. Nowadays, if one was to declare themselves a fan of Chelsea football club, the reply you would get would most probably before or After Roman Abramovich? Chelsea Football Club was bought over by a rich oil merchant in 2003, and this led to an provoke disadvantage of commercialisation in sport. Because of the large amount of capital that is provided to these clubs who are bought over by rich businessmen, they are able to buy their musical mode to success.This effectively destroys sportsmanship in the spirit of competition and causes unfair advantages to smaller teams that do not have that large an amount of capital at their inclination and thus are unable to spend as freely. This is not just limited to football. Sport that are taken over by sponsorship or under ownership will all suffer from this disadvantage. In F1, Ferrari and MacLaren are alship canal the teams that occupy the pole position whereas teams with less renowned cars like Toyota rarely become champions.Hence, commercialization has been proven to disrupt and distort the acting field, providing unfair economical and thus other advantages to certain(a) teams Commercialisation is meet increasingly prevalent in sport and while this moral issue would g enerally be perceived as positive with the availability of more money and resources, many believe that the idea of sport as an manufacturing has allowed connoisseur sport to become overly competitive and the rise of riots over out-of-pocket to sports, is a recognizable consequence of this. This change in many ways allowed us to enjoy the level of passe-partout sport we enjoy in Singapore today.However, some believe the trickle down of commercialisation to amateur sports has amplifyd the tendency to provide some type of reward with athletes adopting an attitude of winning no matter the cost. This is now even seen inwardly the Olympics with athletes who live off their sport now competing in an amateur competition. Children in particular are today are socialised to value winning over playing fair. This affects their moral knowledge and development, ultimately affecting their decision making. Commercialisation of sports is bad as it only advertise certain types of sports as well as its players.This makes people believe that the sport being advertised is more popular than the rest. Furthermore, peoples knowledge on the types of sports will be limited. The same applies to the player being internationally well cognise. The player may not be the best player but due to the vast commercialising of him, it may stimulate a perception that he is the best player. As a result, people are ignorant about the worthiness of the players and their feelings are being toyed with if it is known that their favourite player is just an average sportsman. Therefore, commercialisation of sports is bad.Commercialisation is bad due to the social impact it resulted. It have been noted that many kids at once dream about making money through sports like hoops instead of just playing the game the love. For instance, a magazine named have inter line of credit talks about basketball and the players in NBA. It consists of an advertisement which asks What Sports Center do you watch. Then it says, Steve Francis watches the 6AM Sports Center. In my opinion, the advertisement is trying to use Steve Francis popularity to stoop audiences to watch the Sports Center. This is one example of companies using sports figures to sell their products.In the advertisement, the characterisation of Steve Francis in his house, shows us what really is important to him the pool and golf course in his back yard through the window in his bedroom. Hence, it is part due to commercialisation of sports that many people look up to him in terms of his material possessions and not the way he plays basketball. Positive There will be an increase in higher quality of performance as people essay to do better and win in sports. Funding and business profits from the commercializtion of sports enable sportsmen to improve themselves and thus ring the sport to higher grounds. If a player lacks equipment or proper preparation grounds like, say a tennis court, funding and money can provide the play er with what he requires to improve his skills. Sports has to be commercialized in order to gain these funds, and thus the commercialization of sports is good. Commercialisation plays an important procedure in the sport existence. It helps to provide the funds and resources needed for athletes to be able to perform at their fullest electromotive force. Take a Track and Field athlete for example, without a proper pair of spikes the athlete cannot perform his best.Without commericalisation there will not be efficient athletes and without efficient athletes the sport cannot be exist. frankincense commericalisation plays an important role in the sports industry to help keep sports lively by providing funds and resources needed. Another benefit for commercialization of sports is that amateur level sports can benefit through commercialization of sport at the professional level. Commercialization has brought greater exposure to sports such as A-League, NRL, Super 14 and these sports at an amateur level benefit directly through commercialization and the exposure brings it to a professional level sporIndeed, sports helps to catch revenue not only for the benefit of creating more capital for sports but also to generate more revenues for different industries. Modern sports links to commerce are exceedingly visible. Stadiums and arenas bear the names of businesses, sponsors logos are appearing on athletes robes and equipment and on the facilities they play in. Media companies pay a huge amount for the rights to program sports events, and advertisers pay to promote products during the screening of sports events.The revenue of a country would increase due to the commercialisation of sports as more international competitions will be held in the country. Advertisements of the tournament or competition would interest more foreigners and bring in greater revenue. This would be adept to the countrys economy. It was evident for the Beijing Olympics held in 2008 where many people turned up for the major event due to commercialisation hence, contributing to mainland Chinas economic growth the facilities built could still be used to train more athletes and sportsmen, hence, allowing them to perform at their full potential to prepare for future competitions.With better competitors, the sports event would be more raise and entertaining to the viewers and this would generate revenue to the country especially if it is the one hosting the event. This would potentially lead to economic growth. In China, the commercialisation of sports was also a strategy to increase its soft power which is the ability to affect others to obtain the outcomes China wants. It has helped China to appear more attractive to other countries and this is the first metre for China to build political relations with other countries, making it beneficial for them.Commercialization of sports has resulted in the increase in the number and quality of sports shown on television today. With out commercial sponsorship, people would not be able to take note their favourite sports from their homes as closely as they want. Thus commercialization of sports has benefited auberge in providing entertainmen Through commercialisation, sports have been able to reach out to large audiences. With the help of the business community, there is funding and also international reporting from the media.If not, international sports events such as the Olympic Games or the Sea Games would not be made possible. It is due to this support, that athletes are able to compete and to strive for the very best in such key international events. Furthermore, sponsorships and partnerships can help sports create opportunities, such as the Olympic Games, to not only survive but thrive in todays much economically and work-driven world. Moreover, commercialisation of sports can give a good exposure of the sport to youths of todays society.The lives of many youths today revolve around technology, leading to a very quotidian lifestyle. Thus this exposure may lead to them picking up certain sports, diversifying and making their lifestyle more active instead of just using up hours on end on their computers. Thus, sports should be an important aspect of our lives and the only way to ensure it continues to flourish, especially in todays context, is through commercialisation.