Native Americans in “The Pearl” by John Steinbeck Essay

Steinbecks The Pearl is unmatched of his most intriguing pieces. Steinbeck manages to fit some different desires into a short novella that is under a one C pages. However, what makes The Pearl truly a great book is his critique of colonial society, and the interaction of inborn Ameri idlers and settlers. Steinbeck emphasizes the differences among the colonists and the native Indians by using much(prenominal) symbols as the relationship amidst townspeople and village, education, and instinct. Steinbeck as well as shows that he views ever-changing ones station, or attempting to, as foolish and impossible, tho that move to is strikeed to provide an example for others.Steinbeck intents the differences between town and village as a metaphor for the differences between the colonists and the inseparable Americans. Steinbeck shows how he uses the stark differences between the huts of the infixed Americans and the grand villas of the colonists in the following creditThey cam e to the place w here(predicate)(predicate) the tangle houses stopped and the city of stone and plaster began, the city of harsh satellite w every(prenominal)s and inner cool gardens where a teensy-weensy water played and the bougainvillea ill-humored where walls with purple and brick-red and white. (Steinbeck, pg. 8)In this quote, Steinbeck emphasizes the stark difference between the village, made of artless materials, and the town, made of expensive materials. Steinbeck alike uses the towns buildings as a metaphor for the citizenry deep down, as Steinbeck describes the buildings as having harsh outer walls, hardly having inner cool gardens. This could be a metaphor for the concourse within the building, portraying the plurality inside them as, at once, very kind and nice, just now solitary(prenominal) once those walls had been let down. This shows the colonists as macrocosm very xenophobic, and being kind to their own race but harsh to other races.Steinbeck reinforce s the idea that the colonists were subsisting give way than the inherent Americans in the following quoteThe furtherance left the brush houses and entered the stone and plaster city where the streets were a little wider and there was a narrow pavement beside the buildings. (Steinbeck, pg. 47)Steinbeck shows that the natural Americans saw the colonists living conditions as better than theirs, and that the streets were a little wider, which could be seen as a commentary for most things, and that in most things, what the colonists lived a little better.Steinbeck here tells us, and when combined with the quote preceding(prenominal), the colonists atomic number 18 living better than the Native Americans. Because the colonists establish plenty of resources, and the Native Americans ar not living in the highlife of the colonists, it indicates an unfair share of wealth, which is oddly skewed in the favor of the colonists. This reinforces the already presented idea that the colonis ts are, overall, living better than the Native Americans.Steinbecks next sanction to differentiate between the colonists and the Native Americans is using their instinctual actions. Steinbeck shows that the colonists and Native Americans are instinctively different, thus he attempts to give an excuse, or perhaps a reason, for the differences between them, and their outcomes. Steinbeck explores into the instinctual differences between the Native Americans and the colonists in the following quotesThere was sorrow in Kinos rage, but this last thing had tightened him beyond breaking. He was an animal now, for hiding, for attacking, and he lived just now to protect himself and his family despite his need for a canoe, neer once did it occur to him to obligate one of the canoes of his neighbor. (Steinbeck, pg. 42)He could kill the specify more easily than he could talk to him, for all of the doctors race spoke to all of Kinos race as though they were simple animals. (Steinbeck, pg. 9) Once again, we can see the recurring theme that the Native Americans mother become whatever the colonists mold them to be, and as seen in the indorsement quote, Steinbeck says that the doctors race spoke to all of Kinos race as though they were simple animals, and Steinbeck says in the first quote that Kino was an animal now. This shows that Kino, and his people as a hale, have become what the colonists have made them, and that they have become whatever the colonists wished them to be. This shows that the colonists contain every facet of Native American life, and that anything that they want to be through with(p) exit be done.Steinbeck shows that the colonists have been raised with the instinctive belief that they were in a higher place the Native Americans, and that they were better than the Native AmericansHave I got nothing better to do than cure insect bites for little Indians? I am a doctor, not a veterinary. (Steinbeck,pg. 11)This shows that the doctor thought that the Indians were animals, and because of the fact that the colonists have been model the Indians beliefs, the Indians thought that they were animals, perhaps resulting in the instinctive animal behavior. Steinbeck says in the previous(prenominal) quote that the colonists treated Kinos race like that, so perhaps it has become an instinctual reaction to the oppression of the colonists.Steinbeck says that Kino was an animal who lived solitary(prenominal) to protect himself and his family, showing that he did it as an instinctive defense, and that he only becomes an animal to protect his family. Steinbeck also emphasizes that Kino becomes his animal alias only when he needs to hide or protect himself. This shows that Kinos people have developed this as a natural defense, and its use is only for defense. This also shows that his people developed it for need of defense, and that continual need of protection is the only reason such a protection would be needed, and there is only one source for this continuous onslaught, and that is the colonists.Steinbeck also goes so far as to say that the instinctive animal that Kino becomes retains all of the qualities that Kino retains, even so far as his lack of allow for to steal from his own kind. This shows that Kinos alias does not set almost survival of Kino as a person, but Kinos race as a whole. He is unwilling to take from his people, as his alias is unwilling to damage itself. If his alias is for the protection of a whole group of people, consequently they must be under attack from a large group of people, giving us the structure of the assumption that the colonist society persecutes the Native Americans and the Native Americans have developed instincts for their protection.the strangers came with argument and authority and gunpowder to back up both. And in the four hundred age since, Kinos people had learned only one defense- a slight slitting of the eyes and a slight tightening of the lips and a retirement. nada could break down this wall, and they could preserve whole within the wall. (Steinbeck, pg. 17)In this quote Steinbeck shows other instinct, reclusion behind an inner shell, the creation of which has been directly linked to the coming of colonist society. However,this reaction shows more of the actual standpoint of the Native American society, as reactive, and unable to be proactive. This reactivity means that the attitude will remain the same, and if this was the way that Kinos ancestors were and will be, then this situation will remain the same until stopped by distant intervention.This also shows that the Native American society has chosen to preserve itself within their shell, and to submit outside of it. Whenever attacked outside of the shell, they shelter inside their shell of refusal to change, as shown in the above quote. This results in the situation remaining a perfect clone of the situation that it was when it started, resulting in continuing colonist oppression. If t he only place that they can take refuge is within personal shell, then they cannot cook anything outside their shell, and they are therefore powerless outside their shell.The colonist society, as a whole, exerts their control over the Native American population using the yoke of education.This is our one bechance our son must break out of the fold that holds us in. (Steinbeck, pg. 103)Steinbeck here shows what that the Native Americans see lack of education as a plenteousness that holds us in. This also shows that they do not get any chances to learn, for if they did, then they would have more than one chance. As the only way they can learn is to be taught by an educated person, and the only educated people are the colonists, the colonists must be withholding education. This shows that the colonists might be advisedly trying to keep the Native Americans in their pot. It is also interesting that this pot is probably the same as the shell that the Native Americans hide in.He did not know, and perhaps this doctor did. And he could not take the chance of pitting his certain ignorance against this mans possible knowledge. He was confine as his people were always trapped, and would be until they could be sure that the things in the books were really in the books. (Steinbeck, pg. 76)This shows an example of how the colonists use education to control the Native American population. He was trapped as hispeople were always trapped, and would be untilthey could be sure that the things in the books were really in the books. This specific sub-phrase shows how his people trusted the books as reliable sources, information that the colonists must have place.If the colonists planted the knowledge that the books were reliable, being the only people who could read the books, anything and everything that they said about the books, if not a lie, was true. And as the Native Americans did not know when people were lying, anything that a colonist said could be definitely accur ate, or a lie. The risk seemed too much and the Native Americans usually did as they said, as Kino does, because they are afraid of matching their certain ignorance against the colonists possible knowledge.Steinbeck also continually shows that the colonists use their control of religion, through their knowledge of education, as some other way of controlling the Native American populace.It was a good idea, but it was against religionThe loss of the pearls was a punishment visited on those who tried to let their station. And the father made it clear that each man and woman isa soldier sent by god to guard some referenceof the Universe.But each one must remain sure to his air and must not go running about, else the castle is in insecurity from the assaults of Hell. (Steinbeck, pg. 42)This shows that the colonists use their knowledge of religion, due to their reading ability, to keep the Native Americans thinking that they are doing Gods will, or, if they believe otherwise, do so out of fear of being incorrect. The colonists tell the Native Americans that they have to diaphragm in their current position in life, living as short(p) peasants who treat the colonists as royalty, because that that is Gods will. Because the Native Americans are uncertain of what is correct, they take what is, to them, the safer approach, by doing as the colonists say.The colonists also bring in faith, by saying that if they are not faithful to their post, and thus not faithful to their religion, which would be considered blasphemy by the religious Native Americans, then they would be in danger of the attack from the assaults of hell, which could beinterpreted as freeing to hell, which the religious Native Americans would be very afraid of.I perceive him make that sermonhe makes it every year.This shows that the colonists try to keep the Native Americans in line, and that it is, again, a group effort and that the entire colonist fraternity works as one in achieving their goal , the exploitation of the Native American society. This also shows that they do this repeatedly, and probably have for been using the same methods for centuries. This also shows that this oppression is not a one-time thing, and that it is a continuous, calculated, malicious oppression of a race.Steinbeck has shown throughout The Pearl his opinions on the differences between the colonists and the Native Americans by showing their relationship, as the type of relationship is based upon the differences of its members. Steinbeck shows this through the differences between town and village, instinct, and education. Steinbeck portrays the colonists as aggressive, abusive, and manipulative throughout the book, especially towards the Native Americans. The Native Americans are portrayed as obedient, acknowledgeable, and living as underlings for the colonist society.The Pearl by John Steinbeck. The Viking Press & William Heinemann, 1947. ISBN 0-14-017737-X