It/205 Week 8 Checkpoint

The U. S. nosecount Bureau attempted to employ a Field Data appeal Automation (FDCA) program to expedite the battle array of learning. The FDCA project is important to the nose count Bureau for many designers. The outset reason is the reduction of costs associated with the gathering of randomness. Going accession to door with reputation forms is high-priced. The actual forms that atomic number 18 utilise cost the judicature mass amounts of currency to produce. These forms ar past peddled door to door by quite a little who are paid wages and end in ink by residents.The forms then need to be submitted to a local office where another prole who in like manner needs to be paid for their time then keys the information in manually. These numbers and selective information are influential in allocating national official monies to authentic areas of each(prenominal) terra firma and county. Additionally, senate district lines are drawn ground on population. If these f igures are inaccurate, ascribable to human error, funds that are in the main allotted for a current area could be reduced. This reduction could be active many programs in the area.Road upkeep, friendly services and emergency response are just a few of the areas that could be impacted. Simply put, accurate selective information collection is needed to realize that everyone in all parts of the verdant get their fair share. The failed carrying out of the tuner handheld devices was plagued with issues from every direct and department. On the national level, drop of superint closingence posed the largest issue. The national sphere of influence suffers from lack of oversight because in the private sector incentives are offered for the successful, well-timed and cost effective rollout of corresponding programs.Because no one was to receive bonuses or other incentives on the federal level a lack of oversight was easily achieved. The Harris Corporation was promise to build and test the handheld devices including the software. The federal government did not efficaciously convey information about the numerate program to Harris. This poor communicating made the development of the handheld devices super difficult. Harris was also at happy chance for not providing updates on progress. The program was also plagued with technology issues caused by miscommunication.Risk centering was not adequately studied to evince potential issues with the handheld devices. The devices were plagued with bleak speeds while transmitting information to a central office. Once the information was received other twits and flaws within the placement made the information inaccurate. The government and Harris both share the blame for the paradox that ended up be taxpayers billions of dollars. The fortunes involved with this project were easily palpable from the beginning.With so much federal money on the line fair steps could down been interpreted to catch that taxp ayer burden would be minimized. The first step that should bugger off been taken was to set up a direction or group of people that including congressmen, technology consultants and financial advisors. When undertaking such(prenominal) a large and costly undertaking with taxpayer money at second it is necessary to be accountable. Members of the mental faculty on the federal and private end should have been in invariant contact with each other to ensure that problems and issues were resolved.I would have set up a matter at each end so they could effectively pass along the needs of the government to Harris and Harris could relay known issues with the government. Testing and risk assessment should have been a priority and as such should have properly researched and monitored throughout the entire process. every technical specifications should have been distinctly communicated between both entities and having a liaison on both ends would have facilitated proper development. I w ould have ensured that wireless networks were available at certain areas and that proper software was written that was bug free long in the lead actual rollout.It/205 Week 8 CheckpointThe U. S. Census Bureau attempted to employ a Field Data Collection Automation (FDCA) program to expedite the collection of information. The FDCA project is important to the Census Bureau for many reasons. The first reason is the reduction of costs associated with the collection of information. Going door to door with paper forms is costly. The actual forms that are used cost the government mass amounts of money to produce. These forms are then peddled door to door by people who are paid wages and completed in ink by residents.The forms then need to be submitted to a local office where another worker who also needs to be paid for their time then keys the information in manually. These numbers and data are influential in allocating federal monies to certain areas of each state and county. Additionally, senate district lines are drawn based on population. If these figures are inaccurate, due to human error, funds that are generally allotted for a certain area could be reduced. This reduction could affect many programs in the area.Road upkeep, social services and emergency response are just a few of the areas that could be impacted. Simply put, accurate data collection is needed to ensure that everyone in all parts of the country get their fair share. The failed implementation of the wireless handheld devices was plagued with issues from every level and department. On the federal level, lack of oversight posed the largest issue. The federal sector suffers from lack of oversight because in the private sector incentives are offered for the successful, timely and cost effective rollout of similar programs.Because no one was to receive bonuses or other incentives on the federal level a lack of oversight was easily achieved. The Harris Corporation was contracted to build and test the ha ndheld devices including the software. The federal government did not effectively convey information about the census program to Harris. This poor communication made the development of the handheld devices extremely difficult. Harris was also at fault for not providing updates on progress. The program was also plagued with technology issues caused by miscommunication.Risk management was not adequately studied to show potential issues with the handheld devices. The devices were plagued with slow speeds while transmitting information to a central office. Once the information was received other bugs and flaws within the system made the information inaccurate. The government and Harris both share the blame for the conundrum that ended up costing taxpayers billions of dollars. The risks involved with this project were easily visible from the beginning.With so much federal money on the line simple steps could have been taken to ensure that taxpayer burden would be minimized. The first ste p that should have been taken was to set up a committee or group of people that including congressmen, technology consultants and financial advisors. When undertaking such a large and costly undertaking with taxpayer money at stake it is necessary to be accountable. Members of the staff on the federal and private end should have been in constant contact with each other to ensure that problems and issues were resolved.I would have set up a liaison at each end so they could effectively relay the needs of the government to Harris and Harris could relay known issues with the government. Testing and risk assessment should have been a priority and as such should have properly researched and monitored throughout the entire process. All technical specifications should have been clearly communicated between both entities and having a liaison on both ends would have facilitated proper development. I would have ensured that wireless networks were available at certain areas and that proper soft ware was written that was bug free long before actual rollout.