Guns on Campus

Guns on College Campus Should gass be standed on college campus? Kenton L. McGowen Abstract This penning testament determine whether triggermans ingest a place on college, and naturalize camp ingestions. The conclusion that the brand-newspaper reaches is that learners who hold in triggermans will be tempted to use them, curiously at universities and colleges that argon full of drug use, stress, and perplexity. The mixture of ordnance stores into a pattern like that is simply non conducive to a safe milieu.This paper will reward evidence from experts, as well as secernate rulings to show the two sides of gasoline control in regards to teach campuses in order to answer the unbelief Should atom smashers be allowed on college campuses? The constitution of the linked States guarantees our cover to bear arms in order to defend ourselves, neverthe slight where does the line fall where it is ok and not okay to enchant ordnances? The line has shifted from restaur ants, to stores, and now to schools.It is late(a)ly that the promontory has come up, should college campus schoolchilds be allowed to collapse guns? The question is a safety issue and mostly centers around a regard for the preservation of life on these campuses, and whether or not the guns atomic number 18 dead necessary to countenance. It has been spurred on by the recent slew of school shootings that fuddle hit aras of the country, most notably Virginia Tech in 2006. there atomic number 18 valid argumentative points to both sides, however.As previously mentioned, the constitution of the United States guarantees the right to bear arms and also that no hardlyices should be made abridging that freedom, so while some cry for safety and moderation, others simply say that it is illicit to forestall guns from being anywhere at any time. Of course, it is unlawful as well to murder with those guns, and the penalties tied to that be dupen as a impairment in themselves to gun emphasis. The discourtesys setted with guns are already a violation of gun laws in themselves, so it is beneficial, in some thought to submit guns on campus to protect and deter against much(prenominal) crime.This is especially true when you meditate the tote up of school shootings that take aim on campuss in unexampled times. That is where the question stems from in the first place. It is, however, conducive to gun violence to arrest guns around. Many of liberally biased media and their followers argue that guns occupy no place on college campuses. They dispute that these campuses are meant to be institutions of higher schooling and not places to harbor fears of being savor by someone.Someone who is passing to pull a crime with a gun has no respect for gun laws to begin with (which say that you crappernot commit a crime with a gun and at that placefore we cannot expect them to abide by societal norms and not commit crimes with guns). This is especially true o n college campuses because campuses are meant to be learning institutes and olibanum guns do not have a place in them or are a necessity at them. Also, it is my opinion that fighting crime should not be conceivet with by the average citizen and that that is wherefore we have law that we pay taxes for.The citizens should not have to engage in a shootout, when in that location are trained policemen to deal with that issue and that should be utilized in such situations. Society does not inquire to take it upon them to deal with a deranged minority, and should have their tax dollars utilized to do so, as it should be. Also, when you call for the low amount of shootings that do occur at schools nationally, it almost comes glowering as illogical to allow gun select to happen on campuses when the need for them is miniscule.An spotless polity shift is not needed to deal with a deranged minority, just now in order is a affirmable restructuring of policy to make campuses less vu lnerable to the possibility of an attack occurring. Alternatives comprise to controlling gun violence that does not include allowing a completely arm society or bookman body to deal with it. A completely new policy is not what is needed to stop gun violence from occurring on campuss, yet a strengthening of the old policies is definitely needed in order to prevent future attacks on disciple bodies, as weve seen in recent years.Gun Massacres do have an end to them but the steps to end them must be interpreted before we can say that we will have come close to eradicating the problems that cause gun violence to occur in the first place. Perhaps new policy could include keeping police stationed at strategic points on campus to break up respond to affrights right when they are called in, or arming security measures guards mend, or perhaps doing random gun sweeps to make sure that no guns are on campus. These things would be more effective than arming, or allowing, an entire disc iple body that could use he guns for anything. However, those opposed whitethorn see this as an infringement against gun rights, as cobalt found it recently to be in violation of state law. at that place is no evidence that says a well armed society is a polite society sans a quote popular amongst right wingers, and in this occurrence it makes no sense datum to arm a society that would possibly not react in the way that is foreseen, especially if the consequences could be a lot worse than is intended. On the contrary, schools are generally safe areas, as evidenced by the apart(p) incidents of school shootings. Rubino, 2012) When the sheer number of schools in the United States is brought into account, and how few gun violence incidents there are, it makes sense not to arm a student body against a threat that likely will never occur within 50 miles of them, an overwhelming likeliness. A gun free campus is preferent to one with an abundance of guns and an atmosphere of paranoia that would follow suit in the case of it. The absence of guns on a school campus, or university campus would generally subject a safer atmosphere, as well as one bereft of paranoia and anxiety from those who so choose not to carry guns with them.Additionally, forcing guns into places where drinking and drug use is common whitethorn increase victims to gun violence, as alcohol impairs opinion and may not be the safest thing to have weapons around. (Brady Campaign, 2012) The policy that protects students should be changed, but as far as allowing guns to be e reallywhere, it may be too overmuch to ask that an army of students be at the brass of a school that likely will never in its organism see an incident in which guns are used against the student male child from a deranged lunatic bent on absolute bedlam on the campus.Proponents of gun laws for schools that would allow open carry to be an pleasant practice on school campuses cite that schools violate state laws, in some case s, when they do not allow students or module to secret carry while on campuss. This was the reason for the decision from the state of carbon monoxide gas recently to allow guns to be carried by students and power on campuses, as long as they have a concealed weapons permit.The law previously did not extend to the University of Colorado, and the court recently ruled that it is unlawful that it does not. (Coffman, 2012) That raises the question of whether guns should be allowed on campuses in every state with laws allowing for concealed carry practices. Is it unlawful to deny those the right with a concealed weapon license to be able to carry guns on campuss, regardless of their intention? It seems that the law could have some holes in it, notably it would if the licenses to concealed carry were not checked.If concealed carry became a norm, how would anyone be able to tell the variance between those with a concealed weapon license and those without who brought the guns to commit l ess than noble acts upon a student body or a faculty member? The line easily could be blurred between who is there with honest intentions and who is there without. It could be, imputable to open concealed carry on campuss, that one would be undercover with a norm of concealment, in which they too brought a concealed weapon and it was not thought anything of due to others around having concealed weapons.In this scenario, no one would question the legality of the weapon and it would then become a matter of guessing who was there with a license and who was not. This kind of guessing game is dangerous, and if weapons were forbidden on campuss, or wholly allowed to faculty members, it would then be easier for law enforcement, the student body, and faculty to determine who was there with the wrong intentions. All they would need to do would be to look for the gun. School shootings have been in the news in recent times, especially the massacre at Virginia Polytechnic Institute (Virginia Tech) which claimed over 30 lives.The question was raised should students be allowed to have guns in order to prevent attacks like this from happening? some said that if someone would have been armed that the attacker would have been subdued and many lives would have been onlyd. The argument is made, essentially, that a well armed society would be able to engage in a shootout on an attacker that was committing gun violence and that it may deter the attack from happening in the first place.Recently, 13 states are considering legislation that is aimed at creating concealed carry laws on college campuses. (Smalley, 2008) As of current, azimuth is trying to pass a bill to allow concealed carry on campuses, and Utah is the only one that does allow. (Edwards, 2011) This may not be entirely true, however, as someone committed to gun violence is going to commit the act anyway, and lives will still be lost. As a college student, the thought of someone going crazy with a gun is scarey to me and is something that I vexation about from time to time.It is naive to think that there are no guns on college campuss right now, and their legalization may just give law enforcement one less thing to worry about so they can focus on who is a threat with weapons and who is not. Additionally, school shootings have been stopped before due to instructors carrying guns, and it may be useful to allow them to continue to do so. (Hanford, 2008) However, as was pointed out earlier, it does not necessarily mean that everyone should have a gun.A college or university is meant to be a place of learning and it is no place for guns to be had at by the students, unless their intention is to cause problems with them. What is the point of having guns there, anyway? To me, it makes no sense to have one on a college campus and any reason that one would have one besides being law enforcement is completely invalid. As was express earlier, if guns were banned on campuses across the country, it wo uld be easy to determine who was there with the intention to act as an assailant against a student body, and who was not.A grave balance between these though may be allowing staff members to have one in the classroom just in case a Virginia tech incident were to occur again, but arming the student universe of discourse is not necessary at this time nor will it accomplish anything that would see fruitful results for a country with a relatively low amount of school shootings when compared with the amount of schools there are in the country. It will authorize to more gun violence and make the campuss a much less safe place than it was before the days of students being allowed to have guns on them freely.In conclusion, guns have no place in the school environment and there are plenty of opportunities to defend students before another disaster strikes the campuss like happened at Virginia tech or other schools in the past. The alternatives that exist are possibly arming the staff whic h would make campuses safer by acting as a deterrent to any armed attacks that aptitude occur, but a learning facility is just that, for learning, and it should not turn back the allowed carry or use of guns on them.A school should remain a school, and it should not be a place that others fear getting shot at or being attacked, and if guns are allowed then the likelihood just goes up for that kind of senseless attack to occur on a campus, so it is in the best interest of everyone if guns are not allowed on campuss. Though it is an abridgement of the second amendment, sometimes things must be abbreviate in order to achieve safety for all. Personally, I feel rights should sometimes be subverted in the interest of public safety.The benefits of allowing guns on university campuss are only that of stopping a potential attack, but those come up only once in a blue moon and entire policy should not be changed to accommodate it. The debate will ever so rage, as long as the constitution says that gun rights extend to everyone. There will never be a final solution to this problem, but the footmark record of safety for schools so far must be taken into account and for the most part they are safe. Whole new policy is not needed, but an understanding that sometimes shooters fall through the cracks.It is an understanding of humanity and its side effects of existing that will pestis us for as long as the species of humans is around. Humans are by no means perfect, and neither will their shooting track records, but human life is invaluable and a restructuring of policy to better protect it is something that could be in order very soon. Works Cited Coffman, Keith. Colorado court says students can carry guns on campus. Reuters. Reuters News Agency, 5 Mar. 2012. Web. 5 Mar. 2012. . Edwards, D. (2008, January 17). After Tucson shootings, Ariz.Republicans push for guns on school campuses The Raw humbug. The Raw Story Americas 1 completely independent news and politics so urce. Retrieved February 29, 2012, from http//www. raw floor. com/rs/2011/01/17/shootings-ariz-republicans-guns-school-campuses/ Hanford, D. J. (n. d. ). Does out of sight Carry Make Sense In Schools And On Campus? Facilities Management educational Facilities Feature. Facilities Management Cost-Saving Ideas, Jobs, Experts, Technologies, Products, Articles, News, Education and more for Industry Professionals.Retrieved February 29, 2012, from http//www. facilitiesnet. com/educationalfacilities/article/Does-Concealed-Carry-Make-Sense-In-Schools-And-On-Campus10070 Rubino, T. (2012, February 19). Should guns be allowed on school campuses? CBS 5 KPHO . CBS 5 KPHO CBS 5 AZ KPHO Phoenix, Arizona, breaking news, weather,channel. Retrieved February 29, 2012, from http//www. kpho. com/story/16955378/should-guns-be-allowed-on-school-campuses Smalley, S. (2008, February 14). More Guns on Campus? The Daily Beast. The Daily Beast. Retrieved February 29, 2012, from http//www. thedailybeast. com/newsweek/2008/02/14/more-guns-on-campus. html Woods, J. (2011, walk 27). Allowing guns on campus wont make schools safer Houston Chronicle. Houston News, Sports, Business, and Entertainment The Houston Chronicle at Chron. com Houston Chronicle. Retrieved February 29, 2012, from http//www. chron. com/opinion/ prognosis/article/Allowing-guns-on-campus-won-t-make-schools-safer-1690745. phpGuns on CampusIt is obvious all across America that I can handgun is by far one of the most acerbic weapons out there. It is also obvious that a high percent of college students have a drug and or alcohol problem and every student is exposed to both. What happens when you combine both of them? Violence is what happens. We have organizations of uneducated students and adults, such as the SCCC (Students for concealed carry on Campus), that are ignorant because they cogitate a handgun will make them more safe. However, they are very mistaken.The fact of the matter is a gun cant save somebody fr om another gun. People argue that in situations such as 2007 Virginia Tech a student could have taken the shooters out. However, that is not the case. The shooters were taken the first step. They already had their weapons drawn and would have took out anyone out in their way. In most cases if a student is armed they will take them out first. This isnt even accounting for students and or faculty that could get hit in the crossfire. We cant turn a school into a battlefield.College students are associated with drugs and alcohol. That is a fact. All of a sudden you allow guns on campus and you have students taking them to parties and wielding them while under the modulate. Even better Samaritans get impaired while using any substance. Not only does this put students and faculty in danger but it puts police and security units in danger as well. Above all, society is in danger. There are children and families that live within the community that dont need drunk and high students running around with weapons.Intimidation Is another reason why handguns shouldnt be allowed in the school area. Imagine being in a teacher shoes and having a student who you heard or seen carry a firearm to your classroom. What if you have a fear of handguns? Would you be compelled to give him a better grade out of fear? Would you be scared to confront him? We need to take account for all the commonwealth who get involved for one person bring a gun to school and the people involved is everyone. Imagine being another student and having to sit next to a student who is known to be carrying or you have even seen carrying.Possibly you have the same fear as the teacher scenario. This kind of situation needs government intervention for the physical and moral protection of others. Another key fact is that the college scenario is big for racial violence and gang violence environment. Also, that is immaturity related. Our country already has enough racial and gang related violence that we dont need to influence in the college environment. In the big picture allowing concealed weapons on campus will increase violence