'Different cultures have different truths Essay\r'

'â€Å"Different cultures have un worry truths.” â€Å"A truth is that which erect be intromited universally.” What atomic number 18 the implications for knowledge of add uping with these glacial storys? â€Å"Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall set til now free.” A powerful, simple line, taken from the bible. The incessant struggle of mankind, however, has been to find the truth, and this has proven kind of rough. Is thither, as suggested in this quote, only integrity truth? Or argon there diametric truths, dependant on heathen background or society?\r\nUnfortunately, the indecision as it is phrased is flawed. Both statements be false, so whatever knowledge gained from either oneness is also false. trustworthy statement is non placed by how m any people accept some intimacy, whether those people all belong to a single culture, or to the whole knowledge domain. Truth is determined by reality, and â€Å"truth” is the tonus o f any statement that correctly describes any aspect of reality. If a thing is certain, it does non subject argona if nobody accepts it, it is static true. If a thing is false, it does not matter if everybody accepts it, it is dumb false. Everyone in the 12th century current that the Crusades were for a good cause, although with historical appreciation we can see that they were not.\r\nAnother chore with this question is that there is a rest between accepting something and believing in it. People often accept things they atomic number 18 told because authority tells them, or because they do not know enough to find a better answer. Many people are also willing to accept answers because they impart them feel good, not because they have any basis in fact. It seems impossible to keep back with both of these statements, since they are both false.\r\nIf, however, we do restrain with these deuce statements, we find that they are mutually exclusive. If we look at them logically , statement A excludes statement B and vice-versa. This operator that either one of them is false, or they are both regenerate in true situations and wrong in others. To answer this question, we must(prenominal) also ask ourselves â€Å"What is truth?” If we congeal truth as a reality, as something that is always correct no matter what, and as something that can be accepted as fact, than the first statement is cannot be agree with. If different cultures have different truths on the same subject, than there is no truth.\r\nJust because my culture says that the world was created by God in seven days, that does not entertain it is the truth. It is what we trust, but that does not shambling it true. Contrarily, scientists say that we evolved from lesser beingnesss, and that the world was created by dint of a ‘big bang’ which created the universe. This is what they believe to be the truth: it does not mean it is. If nothing can be agree upon, and there are differing opinions, than there is no truth.\r\nThe opposite statement, that truth is something that everyone agrees with, is more valid, at least in my opinion. Everyone can agree on some things, and would fence them truths: the world is round, people should be born with two eyes, the Second World War started in 1939. That there is a group capital of New Hampshire on these issues, from both those who are proficient on these topics and amateurs, means that we can most(prenominal) likely accept them as being of reality. However, this method also has drawbacks: just because everyone agrees with something does not necessarily make it true. For hundreds of years everyone agreed that the world was flat, although it is not, and with photographs to show it, it has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.\r\nEach statement’s value also depends on what area of knowledge we are considering: for logic- ground disciplines, like the Natural Sciences and Mathematics, there should be no di fferences in what is considered truth. Algebra does not change no matter what country you go to, and uncomplete does the rotation of the earth. Although there may be religious or cultural differences concerning these truths, much(prenominal) as in Kansas where they banned evolution from textbooks, this does not change that the facts are still the same if you talk to people who are knowledgeable around the subject.\r\nFor disciplines that are based more on perception, emotion, and language it can be much more difficult to be to a conclusion: these cannot be proven with figures and objective data. What is learned in an Ethics class is more a matter of cultural influences. People in Nigeria may believe that they have the right to stone a woman to demolition for adultery, while in Europe we would consider this a most improper thing to do. In Japan, it is considered rude to look a superior in the eye whist talking to them, but in the States it would be considered rude to not casi ng them. Because of these differences, it is most certainly not true to state that â€Å"Looking someone in the eye is rude.”, although that is the truth of the culture. As I said earlier, truth cannot be changed. What would be correct is to state that â€Å"In Japan, looking for someone in the eye is rude.” This is true everywhere to everyone.\r\nThese two statements also come from opposite schools of philosophy: those that believe in subjective truth and objective truth. To agree with both of these statements is impossible, since they both contradict all(prenominal) other. Agreeing with either of them, however, is also wrong. Even if no one knows the absolute truth about something yet, that does not mean that the present answers are a suitable replacement. Truth does not change, no matter who accepts it.\r\n'